Judge Orders Trump Administration to Preserve Signal Chat Linked to Yemen Airstrike Plans

In a major legal move, Judge James Boasberg has issued a temporary restraining order preventing the deletion of a Signal group chat used by senior Trump administration officials to coordinate airstrikes in Yemen. The order was granted after watchdog group American Oversight raised concerns that officials used encrypted messaging apps for official duties, potentially bypassing the Federal Records Act.

Chat Reveals Operational Details and Raises Intelligence Concerns

The Atlantic published excerpts from the chat, revealing that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared precise timings of airstrikes, while National Security Adviser Michael Waltz disclosed how a Houthi target was tracked to a private residence.

Despite White House assurances that no classified information was included, former intelligence officials argue that the messages pose a serious threat to national security. John Sipher, a retired CIA officer, warned that adversaries could gain insights into U.S. surveillance methods, possibly compromising future operations.

Officials Under Scrutiny for Use of Personal Devices and Apps

Reports suggest that officials may have used personal devices to access the Signal group, raising further concerns over cybersecurity risks from hostile nations like China and Russia. The use of unsecured messaging apps for coordinating sensitive military operations has come under sharp criticism from Pentagon officials and intelligence experts.

Former NSA general counsel Glenn Gerstell and Pentagon spokesperson Sabrina Singh both stressed that even “minor” comments made in the chat could have warranted classification, calling the breach deeply troubling.

Backlash and Divided Reactions on Social Media

Social media responses to the leak have been divided:

Some users viewed the court order as a major win for transparency.

Others defended the Trump administration, claiming the chat showed efficient military decision-making.

Critics condemned the officials involved, especially Hegseth, for irresponsible behavior that may have endangered U.S. soldiers.

Ongoing Legal and Political Fallout

While the Trump administration maintains that the messages were sensitive but not classified, the court case and investigation continue. American Oversight’s lawsuit seeks to ensure the messages are preserved and reviewed under legal frameworks governing official government records.

This case raises broader questions about digital security, government transparency, and the appropriateness of using private messaging platforms for matters of national defense. As scrutiny intensifies, the Signal chat controversy is poised to remain a flashpoint in Washington.

Read More: Global Aid Rushed to Myanmar and Thailand After Devastating Earthquake Kills Over 1,700