Suspense Crime Sach Ka Dam
Understanding the Legal Saga: Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal’s Response to ED’s Allegations
In the recent legal saga surrounding the excise policy, Delhi’s Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal finds himself entangled in a legal battle with the Enforcement Directorate (ED). The ED has filed its response in the Delhi High Court, addressing the allegations put forth by Kejriwal. This article delves into the intricacies of the case and sheds light on the responses presented by both parties.
The Allegations
Kejriwal: The Alleged Mastermind
In its response to the court’s notice, the Enforcement Directorate has labeled Arvind Kejriwal as the mastermind and principal conspirator behind the excise policy scandal.
Kejriwal’s Defense
The Delhi Chief Minister has vehemently denied these allegations, challenging his arrest in the Delhi High Court and seeking interim relief.
Court’s Directive to ED
During the previous hearing, the court directed the Enforcement Directorate to submit its response by April 2nd. Today, the Delhi High Court is scheduled to hear the case.
ED’s Response
Kejriwal’s Role in the Scandal
In its response, the Enforcement Directorate has reiterated its stance, claiming that Arvind Kejriwal played a pivotal role in orchestrating the excise policy scandal. According to the ED, Kejriwal was directly involved in the formulation of the excise policy, benefiting certain individuals and engaging in corrupt practices.
Allegations of Misuse of Funds
The ED further alleges that funds obtained through illicit means were utilized during election campaigns in Goa, implicating Kejriwal and his party members.
Rebuttal by AAP
Denial of Allegations
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has vehemently refuted the claims made by the Enforcement Directorate, labeling them as baseless and politically motivated.
Lack of Evidence
AAP has pointed out the lack of concrete evidence presented by the ED in support of its allegations, emphasizing that no money trail or substantial proof has been provided.
Allegations Against BJP
Additionally, AAP has accused the ED of acting at the behest of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), insinuating that there is a concerted effort to destabilize the Delhi government led by Kejriwal.
The legal battle between Arvind Kejriwal and the Enforcement Directorate underscores the complexity of political and legal dynamics in India. While ED continues to stand by its allegations, AAP maintains its stance of innocence, attributing the accusations to political vendetta.
