In the halls of a Dehradun civil court, a family feud over ancestral property just hit a financial roadblock. A judge recently lost patience with a defendant who was allegedly trying to stall the case by failing to provide timely responses. The result? A fine and a stern legal warning.
Here’s the story of the sibling rivalry that moved from the living room to the courtroom.
The Dispute: A Battle for the 1/4th Share
The case was filed by Fariyal Makandar against her brother, Firoz Ali, and others. Fariyal is seeking a 1/4th share of her parents' ancestral property. She claims that her brother has been interfering with her "peaceful possession" of her portion of the estate.
Back in July 2025, the court had already stepped in, issuing a "status quo" (stay) order. This meant no one could sell the property or build anything on it until the case was settled.
The Brother’s Defense: "She Doesn't Even Live Here"
Firoz Ali attempted to have the stay order lifted. His argument was simple: his sister has remarried and lives in her own flat in Mumbai. According to him, she doesn't actually possess any part of the Dehradun property and took the stay order by misleading the court.
However, the court wasn't convinced by his plea to remove the stay and ultimately rejected his application.
Why the Fine?
The court's primary frustration was the delay. In Indian civil courts, "adjournment tactics" (trying to delay the case) are a common grievance. Because Firoz Ali failed to file his response on time and was seen as slowing down the judicial process, the court imposed a fine of ₹1,000 on him.
The court also extended the stay order, ensuring that the property remains untouched until the next hearing.
Other Recent Legal Tidbits from Dehradun:
A Lesson in Honesty: In a separate case, a man who broke traffic rules admitted his mistake in court. Instead of jail time, the judge gave him a break and closed the case with just a fine.
No "Work From Home" for Witnesses: An elderly woman asked the court if she could give her testimony from home due to illness. The court rejected the plea, insisting she must come to court to testify in person.
Seeking a Death Report: The court has asked for a formal report following the news that an accused person, Deshraj Sood, has passed away.
The Lesson
Property disputes are often emotional and long-drawn. However, this ruling serves as a reminder: the court’s time is valuable. Failing to respond or attempting to stall proceedings can come with a literal price tag.
Read More: A Legal Wake-Up Call Dehradun Court Fines Brother for Delaying Property Dispute Case
Share



