Congress to Pursue Legal Action Against BJP Leaders Over Defamatory Remarks:

Suspense crime, Digital Desk : On Tuesday, the Indian National Congress said that they are considering suing two other political leaders in the BJP for allegedly committing defamation against the Congress party and its leadership.

Jairam Ramesh, posting on X, said, “The INC is undertaking steps under both civil and criminal law against two offenders who personify malice of truth and respect constituting a industry pretending nasty against the INC and its leadership. Wait for it…”

Amit Malviya expressed his anger aimed toward Rahul Gandhi because of his remarks about Operation Sindoor.

This comes after strong counter attack from BJP’s IT cell head Amit Malviya who branded Rahul Gandhi as a “modern day Mir Jafar.” Malviya charged the Congress leader with supporting Pakistan’s narrative after Gandhi asked whether he was not embarrassed for his silence during the so-called loss of all India’s aircrafts in the ‘Operation Sindoor.’

Malviya further maintained that the Indian media’s portrayal of the operation, where the commander’s Indian aircraft losses were highlighted over claiming success, reinforces Pakistan’s anti-Indian propaganda.

BJP Blames Gandhi For Sabotaging The Internal Cohesion Of The Country

As previously noted by Oberoi, ‘Instead of congratulating PM Modi on the success of Operation Sindoor, Rahul Gandhi repeatedly asks how many jets we lost – a question answered in DGMO briefings.’ We also haven’t heard how many Sukhois were shot down or captured during the operation from Gandhi’s perspective, as his narrative completely ignores losses suffered by Pakistan and the overall Indian military achievements.

Malviya also claimed that Gandhi, by default, becomes an ally of Pakistan in trying to divert global focus from terrorism in which Pakistan is suspected to be involved.’Pakistani media has, in earlier times, weaponized his comments. His statements provide justification for the sponsors of cross border terrorism,’ he stated instead.’