JSSC CGL Exam Controversy: Former Advocate General Alleges Suppression Of Facts And Answers Being Memorized
The controversy surrounding the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission Combined Graduate Level (JSSC CGL) examination has taken a dramatic turn. Former Jharkhand Advocate General Ajit Kumar has launched a scathing attack, alleging that the state government, the JSSC, and the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) deliberately withheld critical facts from the judiciary regarding the high-profile examination case. The explosive claims have reignited massive concern among aspirants and student bodies demanding complete transparency and accountability in the recruitment process.
Serious Allegations Against Government, JSSC, And CID
Addressing students and the public from Ranchi, former Advocate General Ajit Kumar pointed out severe discrepancies in the official affidavits submitted during the Prakash Kumar court case. He noted that the government and the JSSC previously maintained that the paper leak was minimal and that candidates were merely making educated guesses based on past examination patterns. Terming these official assertions as entirely misleading, Kumar stated that the comprehensive case diary contains crucial investigative evidence that was intentionally kept away from judicial scrutiny, undermining the quest for truth.
Students Forced To Memorize 120 Answers Without Question Papers
Unveiling shocking details of the alleged malpractice, Kumar claimed that findings from the ongoing probe indicate a deeply entrenched, organized systemic flaw rather than casual preparation. According to evidence gathered during investigations, select students were allegedly supplied with exact answer keys containing 120 answers to memorize directly, without even being permitted to look at the actual question paper beforehand. Such precision points toward a severe breach of examination security, far exceeding ordinary instances of routine competitive test leaks.
High Court Probe Deadline Nears As Investigation Lags
Expressing deep concern over the pace of the judicial process, Ajit Kumar highlighted that the Honorable High Court had explicitly directed investigating authorities to wrap up the probe within a strict six-month window. With that crucial time frame now on the verge of completion, the formal investigation remains unfinished, leaving candidates in a state of prolonged anxiety. Legal experts and aspirants hope that these revelations will prompt faster judicial intervention and expose the full magnitude of irregularities behind the JSSC CGL recruitment drive.
