CIA Begins Dismissing Officers Involved in Recruitment and Diversity Initiatives

The CIA is reportedly firing personnel who worked on recruitment and diversity initiatives. This follows a report by The New York Times as part of a broader strategy by the agency to dismiss diversity programs as per Donald Trump's executive order.

While the CIA was in the middle of firing officers undergoing administrative leave, a federal court stepped in and dismissed those orders. According to the report by The New York Times, a new hearing will be taking place regarding a restraining order against the airlines.

Court documents show that director John Ratcliffe of the CIA intends to carry out more firings under the existing administration. To block the recent spate of layoffs, Kevin Carroll, a lawyer representing 21 intelligence personnel, suggests that there is strong reason to suspect there will be a further and larger scale witch hunt.

More often than not, firings of career officers are a rarity when a new administration comes in to the CIA. For example, the case held against officials accused of torturing Al Qaeda suspects never resulted in the dismissal of officers during the time Barack Obama was president, and Obamas tenure ended the CIA interrogation program. The latest one was in 1977 under Jimmy Carter when CIA Director Stansfield Turner dismissed 198 covert operations officers.

None of them are certified professionals, but many of them have been relocated to ‘recruitment’ positions because they know how to persuade and gather intelligence. Carroll claims that, at least, 51 base officers are review are currently under review.

“There is no professional basis for Carroll's claims. As claimed, no one joins a CIA with the title ‘diversity recruiter’, rather diversity programs set on an order decree basis. He also said the agency should have been able to avoid such cuts with a downsizing masking, citing national security as the reason.” Carroll said in an interview with The New York Times.

On the contrary, government lawyers argued that preventing dismissals would mean public interest would get harmed and supercede Ratcliffe’s command over the people in the agency. Restricting such personnel decisions is something we have come to expect from the Supreme Court, and they out us all benefit.

With an Aim to Enhance Inclusiveness, the Intelligence Community Had Prioritized This Issue During the Tenure of Former CIA Director William J. Burns and Former Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines. Carroll argues that all he did was help fulfill the objectives set by intelligence bosses and Congress, who had already legalized diversity efforts in previous laws.

“The CIA has the greatest need for diversity compared to all government agencies,” Carroll said. “We need to have people who can mix in overseas.”

Read More: A Region on the Brink: Why the Latest Escalation in the Middle East Matters to You