Jitan Ram Manjhi Urges Speaker Om Birla to Grant More Parliamentary Time to SC-ST MPs
_348972469.jpg)
Championing parliamentary equity for marginalized representatives, Union Minister and Hindustani Awam Morcha (Secular) supremo Jitan Ram Manjhi has written a formal representation to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, urging the Chair to ensure that Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) Members of Parliament receive sufficient time to articulate their constituents' issues on the floor of the House. Sent on September 16, 2026, the letter brings forward persistent grievances articulated by first-time tribal and Dalit parliamentarians who struggle to obtain speaking slots during high-decibel legislative debates. Manjhi appealed directly to the Speaker to institute concrete operational measures so that grassroots representatives from historically disadvantaged communities can voice regional concerns without administrative compression.
Origin of the Demand: NDA Meeting Discontent and Gajendra Patel's Intervention
The formal push follows an internal conclave of National Democratic Alliance (NDA) parliamentarians held at Manjhi’s official residence in New Delhi on August 5, where multiple lawmakers voiced frustration over limited procedural opportunities:
The Triggering Discourse: During the interaction, BJP MP Gajendra Singh Patel—who represents the tribal-reserved Khargone parliamentary seat in Madhya Pradesh—raised the issue of time allocations during legislative proceedings.
Collective Sentiment: Clarifying the nature of the deliberations, Patel noted that while the exchange took place in an informal setting, the sentiment was widely shared among attendees, emphasizing that every elected representative seeks substantive time to table the needs of their constituencies.
Quarterly Feedback Platform: Manjhi pointed out that these intra-alliance meetings are convened every three months specifically to assess the concerns of grassroots lawmakers, noting that newly elected SC and ST MPs in particular felt their floor participation was severely curtailed by tight party time quotas.
Ideological Fault Lines: The Simmering Sub-Categorization and Creamy Layer Debate
Manjhi's intervention on parliamentary representation arrives amidst his vocal advocacy on structural affirmative action policies, where sharp ideological contrasts have emerged within the ruling coalition:
Sub-Categorization Advocacy: Alongside his son and Bihar cabinet minister Santosh Kumar Suman, Manjhi has strongly supported the sub-classification of Scheduled Castes and the application of creamy layer principles, arguing that historically marginalized sub-castes like the Musahar and Bhuiyan communities have remained deprived of reservation benefits captured by relatively dominant groups.
Chirag Paswan's Counter-Position: Conversely, key NDA partner and Union Minister Chirag Paswan has openly opposed the creamy layer concept for SCs and STs, asserting that reservation is fundamentally designed to rectify deep-rooted historical untouchability and social bias rather than pure economic backwardness.
Intra-Alliance Dialogue: Having engaged in a public ideological debate over the reservation criteria in August, Manjhi's latest demand to Speaker Om Birla underscores his continued push to elevate underprivileged Dalit and tribal voices within the country’s highest democratic forum.
_1292052194_351x234.jpg)
_401208926_351x234.jpg)
_348972469_351x234.jpg)
_1596587267_351x234.jpg)