Supreme Court Takes Cognizance: CJI Surya Kant Breaks Silence on Allegations Against Rajasthan HC Acting CJ
_2095713084.jpg)
The Indian judiciary has found itself at the center of a major discussion following serious allegations raised within the top legal circles. Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant has officially responded to the controversy surrounding Rajasthan High Court Acting Chief Justice Sanjiv Prakash Sharma. Addressing the contents of letters sent by Supreme Court Judge Justice Sandeep Mehta, the CJI emphasized that the matter is being handled through established institutional mechanisms and strict adherence to due process.
CJI Takes Cognizance of Letters Sent by Justice Sandeep Mehta
A formal press statement issued by the Supreme Court confirmed that CJI Surya Kant and the collegium members have taken official cognizance of the communications sent by Justice Sandeep Mehta. These letters specifically address the functioning and appointment process concerning the Acting Chief Justice of the Rajasthan High Court. The Supreme Court administration is currently reviewing all aspects of the administrative file as part of ongoing deliberations regarding High Court leadership appointments nationwide.
Serious Allegations and Demands for Transfer
Justice Sandeep Mehta reportedly addressed three separate letters to the Chief Justice of India, outlining serious concerns regarding Acting Chief Justice Sanjiv Prakash Sharma. Within these communications, the allegations suggest conduct deemed contrary to judicial dignity and institutional propriety. Justice Mehta has formally requested administrative measures, including the transfer of Justice Sharma outside of Rajasthan and the appointment of a senior judge from an alternative high court to lead the state judiciary.
Fairness and the Principle of Natural Justice
Responding to inquiries regarding the public discourse, CJI Surya Kant firmly maintained that matters concerning judicial integrity cannot be adjudicated through media debates or public speculation. Highlighting the fundamental principles of natural justice, the CJI noted that any judge facing scrutiny must be provided a comprehensive and fair opportunity to present their perspective before conclusions are drawn. An individual cannot be deemed culpable solely based on preliminary allegations without a thorough review of facts and official responses from all involved parties.
Institutional Inquiry and Strict Adherence to Procedure
The official statement issued under the directives of the CJI reiterates that the issue is undergoing internal institutional evaluation. The final administrative decision regarding potential transfers or further steps will rely entirely on a balanced review of the materials submitted by Justice Mehta alongside the formal response provided by Justice Sharma. The leadership remains committed to protecting the dignity of the institution by relying on transparent, impartial procedures rather than external commentary or reports.
_1623670209_351x234.jpg)
_62867329_351x234.jpg)
_768719378_351x234.jpg)
_1346096296_351x234.jpg)
_1108446017_351x234.jpg)
