Congress Defends Mallikarjun Kharge's Remark on PM Modi, Cites Past BJP Speeches
_435328505.jpg)
A fierce political face-off has ignited between the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Indian National Congress following controversial remarks made by Congress National President Mallikarjun Kharge during a public gathering in Patna. The exchange occurred on October 25, 2026, when an attendee shouted from the crowd that Prime Minister Narendra Modi would continue to remain in power, prompting Kharge to make a sharp retort involving the Prime Minister's late father. While the saffron party has launched a blistering counter-offensive demanding apologies for what it termed an unparliamentary personal assault, senior Congress leaders—including former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel and the party's Assam in-charge—have mounted a aggressive defense, accusing the ruling party of hypocrisy and claiming that the BJP originally introduced personal vitriol into mainstream political discourse.
What Triggered the Flashpoint: Patna Event Disruptions and Kharge's Remark
The controversy erupted during a high-profile commemorative function organized in the Bihar capital:
139th Birth Anniversary Celebrations: Mallikarjun Kharge was addressing a large gathering in Patna organized to mark the 139th birth anniversary of Bihar's first Chief Minister, Dr. Shri Krishna Singh, when disruptions broke out within the crowd.
The Slogan Interruptions: As Kharge laid out his political critiques, an attendee began shouting loudly from the gathering that "Only Modi will come" and that the Prime Minister would not be unseated from office.
The Counter-Retort: Reacting to the continuous heckling, the Congress National President retorted sharply from the dais, remarking that not only Modi, but his father would also go, setting off immediate outrage across administrative and political circles.
'You People Started It': Congress Leadership Mounts Fierce Counter-Attack
Refusing to back down in the face of widespread BJP condemnation, prominent Congress leaders defended Kharge's response:
Assam In-Charge Fires Back: The Congress in-charge for Assam questioned the BJP's moral stance on linguistic decorum, arguing that the ruling party was the original initiator of contentious political barbs in the country.
Recalling Controversial Political Slogans: The Congress representative cited past political attacks, alleging that past campaign statements had referenced personal attacks such as calling someone a "50-crore girlfriend," invoking "Jersey cow" slurs, or raising rhetoric about "snatching mangalsutras."
Silence Over Ruling Party Rhetoric: Opposition leaders questioned why the BJP consistently maintains absolute silence when controversial remarks originate from its own highest leadership, pointing out that public political pushback is simply a reflection of the environment created over past election cycles.
Bhupesh Baghel Dismisses Insult Allegations: Former Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel came to Kharge's defense, asserting that colloquial expressions used in response to stage interruptions cannot be categorized as deliberate insults, framing the comment as an ordinary rhetorical retort common in rural and regional public speaking.
BJP Launches Strong Attack: Ravi Shankar Prasad Terms Remark Shameful and Indecent
Senior Bharatiya Janata Party leaders quickly gathered to denounce the Congress leadership for targeting a leader's family:
Condemnation by Ravi Shankar Prasad: Senior BJP leader and Lok Sabha MP Ravi Shankar Prasad labeled Kharge's statements regarding the Prime Minister and his deceased father as thoroughly indecent, shameful, and reflective of a bitter mindset.
Questioning Congress Stature: Prasad argued that when the national president of the oldest political party stoops to using such terminology against an elected constitutional head, it showcases deep frustration stemming from repeated electoral losses.
Pattern of Institutional Attacks: The former Union Minister further alleged that whenever the Congress encounters voter rejection, it pivots toward discrediting electronic voting machines, questioning constitutional watchdogs, criticizing the Election Commission, and ultimately attacking the Prime Minister's family out of desperation.
_435328505_351x234.jpg)
_157688524_351x234.jpg)
_1994992477_351x234.jpg)
_1673614957_351x234.jpg)