Chirag Paswan Slams Rahul Gandhi Over CJI Meeting Snub on SIR Row
_54210477.jpg)
Union Minister and Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) National President Chirag Paswan launched a scathing political attack on Congress Member of Parliament Rahul Gandhi on Monday afternoon, mocking the opposition leader after the Chief Justice of India (CJI) declined to grant him an official meeting appointment and advised him to approach the judicial forum through standard legal filings. Reacting to the development from Patna, Paswan asserted that while the Congress leadership frequently carries copies of the Indian Constitution in public squares, the apex court's response delivered an essential constitutional lesson on the separation of powers and judicial propriety, rebuking attempts to resolve legal disputes through political delegations.
Constitutional Rebuff: Chirag Takes Jibe at Rahul Gandhi's Outreach Attempt
Taking directly to social media platform X, the Union Minister delivered a sharp critique highlighting the procedural impropriety of seeking administrative appointments on judicial matters:
Lesson on Constitutional Procedure: Addressing Rahul Gandhi directly, Chirag Paswan remarked that carrying the red book of the Constitution during election campaigns does not equate to understanding constitutional boundaries, adding that the Chief Justice of India effectively tutored the opposition leader on proper legal procedure.
Memorandum vs Judicial Petition: Sarcastic in his evaluation, Paswan noted that the opposition front set out with a political memorandum to build pressure but returned with an institutional lecture, underscoring that in a constitutional democracy, legal justice is sought by submitting a formal judicial petition before a court bench, not through political memorandums presented in administrative chambers.
Respecting Supreme Court Jurisdiction: Paswan stressed that political leaders cannot treat judicial corridors as partisan negotiating tables to subvert established bench protocols.
Questioning Street Agitations After the Supreme Court's Verdict on SIR
The LJP(RV) leader sharply challenged the opposition's political agitation over the Special Summary Revision (SIR) of voter rolls:
Defying Apex Court Determinations: Paswan underlined that the Supreme Court has already passed its conclusive judgment on the SIR matter, leaving no constitutional ambiguity on the subject.
Futile Street Pressure Tactics: Calling out the timing of the protests, Paswan questioned why the opposition resorted to street agitations and delegation stunts once their legal arguments had already failed to stand scrutiny inside the courtroom.
Erosion of Institutional Integrity: The Union Minister argued that mounting coordinated campaigns against the apex court and seeking non-judicial interventions amounts to an unconstitutional attempt to mount undue public pressure on independent judicial institutions.
Shifting National Narrative on SIR and Opposition Strategy
Chirag Paswan's intervention marks an important political counter-offensive amid the escalating dispute between the ruling NDA and the opposition alliance:
Strategic Political Counter-Attack: The development comes at a critical juncture when Congress and allied opposition groups are protesting discrepancies in voter lists and targeting the Election Commission and judicial mechanisms.
Exposing Strategic Contradictions: By contrasting the opposition's public posturing with the court's strict refusal to engage in extra-judicial meetings, the ruling coalition has turned the narrative around institutional respect back against the Congress high command.
Reiterating Due Process of Law: Legal and political analysts note that the CJI's refusal reaffirms the constitutional norm that any aggrieved party—regardless of political stature—must present grievances via sworn affidavits and open-court legal petitions rather than executive-style memorandums.
_1632479866_351x234.jpg)
_1460916672_351x234.jpg)
_1731525212_351x234.jpg)
_1233230705_351x234.jpg)
_1871533198_351x234.jpg)